Anyone else notice this?

[vmax4sean]

Anyone notice in this picture, the suspension isn't stock? The sled was supposed to be stock for this picture, to show the STOCK 92 Vmax4.

[BLUE STREEK]

Looks stock to me:sled:

[racer7x]

Looks stock to me:sled:

ME TOO !!!!!!!!!!!:agree:

[vmax4sean]

It's bigger than the suspension I had in my Vmax4. Mabye it was aftermarket

[samiralfey]

It's bigger than the suspension I had in my Vmax4. Mabye it was aftermarket

That photo is from a brand new Vmax4 and our sleds aren't that new anymore so comparing to a photo with a new sled can be little bit deceiving; suspension sitting low(springs, shocks sagged), dents, scratches etc.

[4with4]

Looks a lot like my stock 95 skid. Sean, if your worried about yours looking smaller, be patient, you're still young and it will eventually get bigger!!!:homework: :bum:

Ian

[vmax4rules]

That is the proto-type photo of the 92' V4,
check out the rear skid front arm it has 3 adjustment holes as well as the rear mounting bracket is different and no front or rear bump stops.

[vmax4sean]

oOoOo... Well, we have some new suspension parts. And this sled was used for drag racing, ICE, and GRASS, until it twisted the crank like an S.

So, it probably, mabye had a drag suspension?

[snowrdr]

i beleive vmax4rules is correct. i beleive i have seen this before and someone said it was a proto-type.

[vmax4sean]

So, what, was it a different suspension, but they decieded it was just gonna have the throttle to the bars the whole time, and they lowered the suspension?

[Exciter570]

Doesn't look any be different to me either, maybe they jus had some more adjustments on the proto suspension, it definately doesn't look to be any higher than a normal v4 suspension of that time.

[vmax4sean]

oOoOo... Well, I must of had a lowered, or a drag suspension in mine.

[Snowmax93]

No wonder you went for the X-tra 10 !